Just 'cause it is summer, doesn't mean it is quiet. The department is bringing in two outstanding candidates for faculty positions. Here is the abstract for their presentations this week in EDUC 282:
Victor Lee, Northwestern University- Presentation on May 13 at 12:15
Title
Getting the picture: Historical and cognitive perspectives on visual representations in middle school science
Abstract
Visual representations are pervasive in middle school science curricula and curriculum materials. In this talk, two perspectives are considered with regard to how representations vary and how they are understood. First, an historical perspective is used to identify what trends and patterns emerge in the design and use of representations throughout the past fifty years in published textbook materials. Specifically, through examination of a case of representational change in elementary optics, it is argued that new forms are emerging in part through mechanisms of accumulation and integration. Second, a cognitive perspective is presented. In the cognitive work, accepted claims about negative relationships between representations and conceptual understanding in science are critically examined through the use of clinical interviews with middle school students. Drawing from excerpts of interview data, it will be argued that, despite a seemingly direct and plausible relationship, particular classes of representational forms need not lead to the predicted misconceptualizations. A framework is provided that suggests the observed interpretive and explanatory behaviors of these students is due in part to a degree of pre-existing sophistication for interpreting canonical representational forms and in part to the fluid dynamics of coherence construction in dyadic interactions.
Brian Belland, Purdue University, on May 15 at 12:15
Title:
Problem-based Learning and Solution Presentation: Scaffolding Middle School Students’ Creation of Evidence-based Arguments
Abstract:
Students engaged in Problem-based learning (PBL) units solve ill-structured problems in small groups, and then present arguments in support of their solution. However, middle school students often struggle developing evidence-based arguments (Krajcik et al., 1998). Using a mixed method design, we investigated (a) the impact of computer-based argumentation scaffolds on middle school students’ construction of evidence-based arguments during a PBL unit, and (b) scaffold use among members of two small groups purposefully chosen for case studies. Data sources included a test of argument evaluation ability, debate rating scores, videotaped class sessions, and retrospective interviews. Findings included a significant impact on argument evaluation ability, and use of the scaffolds by the small groups to communicate and keep organized.